From Voice ~ Topics: branding/identity, criticism, graphic design
Design You Can Bank on
Bank design is serious business, for it signals the seriousness of the institution. When money was based on gold, grand American banks such as J.P. Morgan (founded in 1895) and First National City Bank (founded in 1812) were reminiscent of the temples of Greece or cathedrals of Rome—solid, safe places to deposit hard-earned cash. The stately houses of finance were constructed of luxurious materials like marble, granite, bronze and stained glass whose inherent value spoke to the institution’s solemn commitment to take itself and your money seriously. These banks reflected an era when buying on credit was almost unheard of and debit cards hadn’t yet been dreamed up.
When banks were like cathedrals: Home Savings of America Bank (far left); Williamsburgh Savings Bank (center and right, photo: senatorpeter6).
Now that money is plastic, banks are made of Formica, Plexiglas and Sheetrock. (By the looks of them you almost expect them to collapse.) Once built for the ages, banks are built for today. The advent of ATMs and online banking has changed our entire concept of finance and security; most of us are paid via direct deposit and use debit or credit cards for routine purchases these days. Our currency has become largely invisible and somehow seems less powerful.
Consumer banks built in recent times resemble playgrounds, where cash is no longer something to be respected and feared but rather viewed in a carefree manner, as something “fun.” Over the last few decades, banks have made an effort to create hip, easygoing environments to appeal to first time customers who may be hesitant about using their services. Perhaps the thinking is that intimidating buildings will scare away these customers, and that a happy environment will attract lots of happy new bank accounts and loans.
Funky murals and pendant lamps at WaMu Hoboken.
But who could really put their faith in a place calling itself WaMu? (Friendly killer whale, anyone?) It isn’t nice to single out Washington Mutual now that it has enjoyed the dubious honor of being the largest bank failure in American history, but its locations looked more like Starbucks. And this was deliberate: in order to bring in lower-income, no-credit-history customers and lend money to them, they planned their “branch experience” to look like a traditional retail store with slick plastic surfaces in primary colors, cheerful collage-y murals, and groovy pendant lamps, where these people would inherently feel more comfortable. We all know how that story ended.
Bank of America, the nation’s largest consumer bank, seems to have a branch everywhere you look. Their inescapable bright red facades and flat-affect typography are more reminiscent of a Wal-Mart or McDonald’s than of a serious place to park your money. Signature Bank of New York uses a casual brush script and jewel-toned colors for its logo and signage that would be perfect for a clothing boutique or a new line of designer chocolates. You’d never guess the place was a financial institution based on its visual identity. And what about Wachovia’s graceful series of abstract blue and green waves? What exactly are those waves meant to evoke? Is your money supposed to gently wash over you, keep you floating happily along? Does that work if you’re heading down the drain? Commerce Bank has a cheery animated character, Penny, who lives on the coin-counting machine’s video screen and squeaks step-by-step instructions for you in her nasal little voice. The machine is meant for children, but adults use it, too, and I don’t need the assistance of a 10-year-old tomboy to count the last of my savings, thank you very much.
(clockwise from top left): Bank of America’s familiar red and blue facade; Commerce Bank’s animated coin-counting machine; Signature Bank of New York’s casual identity; and Wachovia’s ocean-inspired logo.
Why would banks do this? In a strange, circular way, it comes back to money—only this time it’s the bank’s money, not yours. For a bank to stay competitive, it needs to keep increasing the volume of new customers or sell more products to its existing account holders. And several shiny plastic storefront branches can be opened in very little time for the cost of building one old-fashioned flagship out of solid expensive materials. Quantity has trumped quality, and familiarity signals comfort for consumers. The luxury of multiple branches to choose from and ATMs around every corner holds far more value for time-strapped consumers than having a single beautiful bank location to visit.
Wells Fargo’s logo and trademark stagecoach.
Not all banks jumped on the weird money-is-fun bandwagon in the evolution of their graphic identities. J.P. Morgan’s consumer branch is now Chase, and First National City Bank has become Citibank. Over the course of time these institutions have wisely avoided the “let’s play with money” look that now feels so inappropriate as the economy falters. These institutions communicate continued respect and care for your finances by maintaining a dose of seriousness in their visual representations.
And consider Wells Fargo, founded in the Gold Rush port of San Francisco in 1852. Its graphics still feature the stagecoach that safely brought the payroll (the gold-standard payroll, mind you) to the 49ers. What once might have been viewed as a bit nostalgic or quaint suddenly seems to make a lot of sense. It’s time to restore a little dignity and gravitas to the visual identity of banks, because things are starting to feel like the Wild West once again. I think we need the stagecoach.
-
Very intriguing article. What makes it all the more scary is that I never even realized this reality before. Our society will take whatever is thrown at them without giving it any serious thought.
-
This was a very astute and timely article. It's amazing that many of the beautiful old-time bank branches are being turned into dance clubs and restaurants. I've even had a Herrell's ice cream cone in a former bank vault.
Regarding the comment about how invisible currency is changing our concept of finance, my 7 year-old daughter's school provides a cash card for their cafeteria. The parents put money on the card monthly and the child swipes the card to deduct funds to buy their lunch. Although this is convenient for the cafeteria and many parents, I prefer to send her to school with cash so she learns how much things really cost and how to calculate what change she should receive. -
A perceptive and entertaining look at both this design phenomenon and what it means. Recently I saw a Wachovia bank in New Jersey that looked as if a stiff wind could have, and should have, blown it away and wondered whether we will soon have no bank buildings left that are substantial enough to be turned into restaurants.
-
This is an interesting view you’re giving us here. Who ever though that money would become a piece of plastic with which you could swipe and take whatever you want in everywhere you go? How could we precisely call that? I really pay more attention to how much something costs when I carry cash; however, with a credit or debit card I almost forget what I bought until I realize my bills are going up. Is plastic making us more addicted to debt, especially in these difficult days? What about the piggybank and the precious and unique design of currency? As for banks, I agree with the fact that any financial institution these days has this sort of fake look that certainly doesn’t feel secure at all. Although is convenient when you have and emergency for CASH, it is really miserable to see the many banks that open in every corner and then just sell because of deficit. ¿? How? After customers were paying high rates interests? Where and who should we trust our money these days?
-
I'd agree that some of today's banks are looking more like fast-food joints than the solemn structures of the past, but I think we'll need more than better graphics and church-like buildings to fix our financial institutions.
-
I've been bugged by the recent change in Bank of America's graphic presence. The bright mid-value blue against the bright mid-value red renders the name practically unreadable.
-
I believe the Bank of America signage to be some of the worst in history. Good points in this article. However, the author cites Citibank as one of the more responsible representations in banking-yet they recently had a campaign that touted 'live richly' with visuals that I could never quite make sense of. Was that, 'live richly, use your credit cards to buy what you want even though you can't afford it"? Another bank in the Starbucks category is Umpqua bank in the southwest. Quite a glitzy retail look to an extreme not even WaMu reached.
-
I'm 23, and for some reason while reading this article I felt like a wise old sage, shaking his head at the sad state of our society. I never knew why exactly, but I never liked the feeling I got when I walked into one of those banks (and by 'those banks' I even mean my Bank of America branch I go to regularly). Reading this finally helped me localize that feeling of uneasiness; I realize now that what I have been feeling is mistrust. Kudos to you, Angela, and bah humbug to anyone who dismisses us designers as "artsy-fartsy".
-
I'm now the ripe old age of 25, and I had completely forgotten about how banks used to be.
This article evoked some childhood memories of tagging along with my mom to the bank, and it being a much different experience than it is today. Our bank used to be called Southern National Bank, and its logo was set in a serif typeface in all caps. On the outside, the bank had a red brick facade, and inside there was lots of marble and granite. I also remember glass cases of old guns, bills, coins and other stuff from the days of the Wild West. Really cool concept I think.
Unfortunately, it was later bought out by another one of these 'updated, friendly' concept banks, and all that remains is a 'drive-thru,' a motor bank I guess. Kind of depressing really.
Thanks for the article. -
We seem to be living in an era where everyone is trying to reinvent the wheel. These constant attempts to rethink, remake, and remodel usually turn out for the worst-- the result of our endless dissatisfaction with everything.
That's not to say many interior spaces couldn't be improved with the right eye. A DMV can be a serene, comfortable environment just as it can be a stale, gray one. We should know how to manipulate a space without confusing it with something it was never meant to be. Like the article says, banks were not meant to be coffee houses. These hybrids create confusion. We don't know how to behave or what to expect in the space because the circuits to our senses are getting crossed.
It really comes down to specifics. A mural in a bank? Sure. Just make sure it's the RIGHT one. I'm cool with pendant lamps as well. Just make sure they're the RIGHT ones.
McDonald's has recently adopted a new look for their restaurants that, in my mind, seems pretty successful. Wood trim replaces mauve wallpaper, incandescent sconces replace florescent lights. The look reflects the times (so it's an update, foremost), but there is the subtle shift towards something more "sit down and enjoy" vs. "grab 'n go".
This is a good example of manipulating a space for the better without "crossing our circuits" as the image of the WaMu branch shows. If the elements do not come together as one, it just falls apart. -
"The luxury of multiple branches to choose from and ATMs around every corner holds far more value for time-strapped consumers than having a single beautiful bank location to visit."
Oh how true it is! It's funny, in a sad sort of way, that the whole "fast and whimsical" design of WaMu was in effect when it went under. It makes me miss the slow, cautious, methodical days of old when people didn't think of money as Monopoly-esque play pieces.


Comments